Introduction
Walk into any procurement meeting, and you’ll hear the same objection: “Synthetic labels cost more than paper.” The statement isn’t wrong—synthetic materials typically carry a 20-40% higher price per thousand labels. But this focus on unit cost represents what we call the upfront cost fallacy: mistaking the purchase price for the total cost.
For operations managers, procurement professionals, and CFOs responsible for controlling costs while maintaining quality, understanding the complete financial picture is critical. A comprehensive total cost of ownership (TCO) analysis reveals that synthetic labels frequently deliver superior ROI despite higher initial pricing—sometimes saving 15-30% annually when all factors are considered.
This article provides a data-driven framework for comparing paper and synthetic label costs across your entire supply chain. We’ll examine direct expenses, quantify hidden costs, and show you how to build your own TCO model using actual industry figures. By the end, you’ll have the methodology to make informed labeling decisions based on total financial impact, not just purchase price.
Section 1: Understanding True Label Costs
The Four-Pillar TCO Framework
Total cost of ownership for labels extends far beyond the invoice from your label supplier. A complete cost analysis must account for:
1. Acquisition Costs
-
- Material and printing costs (purchase price per thousand)
- Minimum order quantities and their impact on cash flow
- Freight inbound to your facility
- Supplier management and procurement overhead
2. Carrying Costs
-
- Warehouse space allocation
- Inventory management labor
- Obsolescence risk for date-coded or product-specific labels
- Insurance and shrinkage
- Capital tied up in inventory (typically 15-25% annually)
3. Operational Costs
-
- Application labor and equipment
- Reapplication when labels fail
- Production downtime for label changes
- Quality control inspection time
- Waste disposal and scrap rates
4. Failure Costs
-
- Product recalls due to illegible or detached labels
- Customer complaints and service team time
- Retailer chargebacks for non-compliant labeling
- Regulatory fines and audit costs
- Brand reputation impact
- Re-work and disposal of mislabeled goods
The failure costs pillar is where synthetic labels create their most significant financial advantage. While a paper label might cost $0.02 versus $0.03 for synthetic, a single label failure can cost $5,000-$50,000 when product recall, disposal, and customer impact are factored in.
Hidden Cost Multipliers
Supply chain directors understand that visible costs represent only a fraction of true expenses. Consider these hidden multipliers:
-
- Inventory carrying costs compound monthly. A $10,000 label order costs approximately $2,000-$2,500 per year just to store and manage.
- Labor costs for reapplication typically run $25-$45 per hour including benefits, not counting production delays.
- Customer service time addressing label-related complaints averages 15-30 minutes per incident at $30-$50 per hour fully loaded.
- Retailer chargeback fees range from $500-$5,000 per incident depending on the violation and retailer.
Section 2: Direct Cost Comparison Matrix
Material and Production Cost Analysis
The following comparison uses industry-average figures for 4″ x 6″ labels in moderate volume (500,000 labels annually):
| Cost Category | Paper Labels | Étiquettes synthétiques | Difference |
| Base Material (per 1,000) | $18-$28 | $25-$42 | +$7-$14 (+30-40%) |
| Flexographic Printing | $0.012-$0.018/label | $0.012-$0.018/label | Equivalent |
| Digital Printing | $0.025-$0.045/label | $0.022-$0.040/label | -$0.003-$0.005 (-12%) |
| Minimum Order Quantity | 25,000-50,000 | 10,000-25,000 | 50% lower MOQ |
| Inventory Carrying (annual) | 22% of inventory value | 22% of inventory value | Lower for synthetic due to reduced MOQ |
| Freight Cost (per pallet) | $450-$650 | $380-$550 | -$70-$100 (-15%) |
| Storage (cubic ft/year) | $8-$12 | $6-$10 | -$2 (-20%) |
| Average Shelf Life | 12-18 months | 24-36 months | 2x longer |
| Expected Failure Rate | 2-5% | 0.1-0.5% | 90% reduction |
The True Cost Per Labeled Unit
When calculating cost per labeled unit in real-world conditions, failure rates dramatically alter the economics:
Paper Label Scenario (500,000 labels/year):
-
- Base cost: $20/1,000 = $10,000
- Failure rate: 3% = 15,000 failed labels
- Reapplication labor: 15,000 labels × 2.5 minutes × $35/hr = $21,875
- Replacement labels: 15,000 × $0.020 = $300
- True cost: $32,175 ($64.35 per 1,000 delivered labels)
Synthetic Label Scenario (500,000 labels/year):
-
- Base cost: $30/1,000 = $15,000
- Failure rate: 0.3% = 1,500 failed labels
- Reapplication labor: 1,500 labels × 2.5 minutes × $35/hr = $2,187
- Replacement labels: 1,500 × $0.030 = $45
- True cost: $17,232 ($34.46 per 1,000 delivered labels)
Net savings with synthetic: $14,943 annually (46% reduction in total cost)
Inventory Economics
Minimum order quantities create hidden costs that favor synthetic materials. Consider a mid-size manufacturer with 50 SKUs requiring labels:
Paper Label Inventory Model:
-
- 50 SKUs × 25,000 MOQ = 1,250,000 labels in inventory
- Average value: $25,000
- Carrying cost (22%): $5,500/year
- Obsolescence risk (10-15%): $2,500-$3,750/year
- Total inventory burden: $8,000-$9,250/year
Synthetic Label Inventory Model:
-
- 50 SKUs × 12,500 MOQ = 625,000 labels in inventory
- Average value: $18,750
- Carrying cost (22%): $4,125/year
- Obsolescence risk (5-8%): $937-$1,500/year
- Total inventory burden: $5,062-$5,625/year
Annual inventory savings: $2,938-$3,625
Section 3: Indirect Costs of Label Failure
Quantifying the Unquantifiable
Label failure costs extend beyond simple reapplication. The true financial impact cascades through multiple business functions:
Product Recall Scenario: A chemical manufacturer experiences label detachment on 2,000 units of industrial cleaner already in distribution. The labels contained critical hazard warnings required by OSHA.
-
- Product retrieval and disposal: $45,000
- Regulatory notification and documentation: $8,500
- Re-manufacturing and re-labeling: $28,000
- Customer communication and credits: $12,500
- Legal and compliance review: $15,000
- Total incident cost: $109,000
Even a partial recall of a single SKU can cost 10,000-50,000 times more than the original label. For companies in regulated industries, the math is clear: preventing even one recall event per decade justifies the entire switch to synthetic labels.
Retailer Chargebacks: The Hidden Profit Drain
Major retailers impose strict labeling compliance requirements with significant financial penalties:
Common Chargeback Scenarios:
-
- Illegible barcode: $500-$2,000 per incident
- Missing or damaged label: $750-$3,500 per incident
- Non-compliant format: $1,000-$5,000 per incident
- Repeated violations: Vendor suspension or delisting
A food and beverage company shipping to three major retailers reported 42 chargeback incidents in one year related to label quality issues with paper labels in refrigerated environments. Total cost: $38,500 in fees plus $65,000 in lost sales during suspended periods. After switching to synthetic labels, chargebacks dropped to 2 incidents in the following year (savings: $34,000 annually).
Customer Service Burden
Label-related customer complaints create measurable operational costs:
-
- Average customer service resolution time: 20 minutes
- Fully loaded CSR cost: $40/hour
- Follow-up and documentation: 10 minutes
- Cost per complaint: $20-$25
A manufacturer processing 50 label-related complaints monthly:
-
- Paper label scenario: 50 complaints × $22.50 = $1,125/month ($13,500/year)
- Synthetic label scenario: 8 complaints × $22.50 = $180/month ($2,160/year)
- Annual savings: $11,340
Brand Reputation: The Long-Tail Impact
While difficult to quantify precisely, brand damage from labeling failures creates lasting financial impact. Consider these documented effects:
-
- 43% of consumers report avoiding brands after a negative product experience
- Average customer lifetime value in consumer goods: $2,500-$15,000
- Lost customer acquisition costs for replacement: $200-$800 per customer
A single viral social media post about dangerous label failure can reach 50,000-500,000 people within 48 hours. Even if only 0.1% of that audience becomes hesitant about your brand, the lost revenue potential is substantial.
Case Study: Industrial Chemical Manufacturer
Company Profile: Mid-size chemical manufacturer, $85M annual revenue, 300 SKUs with GHS-compliant hazard labels.
The Problem: Paper labels in their warehouse environment (temperature fluctuations, humidity, chemical exposure) were experiencing 4.2% failure rate. This translated to:
-
- 63,000 labels requiring reapplication annually
- 12 retailer chargebacks for non-compliant labeling
- 1 minor recall event ($47,000 cost)
- 147 customer complaints
- 8 OSHA audit findings requiring corrective action
Total annual impact: $127,400
The Solution: Switched to synthetic polypropylene labels for all hazard-related applications.
Year One Results:
-
- Failure rate: 0.4% (90% reduction)
- Reapplication events: 6,800 (savings: 56,200 labels)
- Retailer chargebacks: 1 (savings: $16,500)
- Recall events: 0 (savings: $47,000+)
- Customer complaints: 18 (savings: $2,907)
- OSHA audit findings: 0 (savings: $8,500 in corrective action costs)
Additional label cost: $22,000
Total savings: $105,400
Net benefit: $83,400 (11.4% ROI on labeling investment)
Section 4: Operational Efficiency Gains
Labor Productivity Analysis
Label reapplication represents one of the most visible operational efficiency drains in manufacturing facilities. The time impact extends beyond the physical act of relabeling:
Complete Reapplication Cycle:
-
- Identification of label failure: 3-5 minutes
- Production line stop or product quarantine: 5-10 minutes
- Label removal and surface preparation: 2-4 minutes
- New label application: 1-2 minutes
- Quality verification: 2-3 minutes
- Documentation and line restart: 3-5 minutes
Total time per reapplication event: 16-29 minutes (average: 22 minutes)
For a facility reapplying 500 labels monthly:
-
- Paper label scenario: 500 events × 22 minutes = 11,000 minutes (183 hours)
- Cost at $40/hour fully loaded: $7,320/month
- Annual labor cost: $87,840
With synthetic labels reducing failure rates by 90%:
-
- Synthetic scenario: 50 events × 22 minutes = 1,100 minutes (18.3 hours)
- Cost at $40/hour: $732/month
- Annual labor cost: $8,784
- Labor savings: $79,056 annually
Waste and Scrap Reduction
Manufacturing waste has direct and indirect costs. Paper label failures contribute to both labeled product scrap and label material waste:
Waste Cost Analysis (1,000,000 labels/year):
Paper labels:
-
- Label waste rate: 3.5% = 35,000 labels
- Product scrapped due to label failure: 0.5% = 5,000 units
- Average product value: $15/unit
- Label waste disposal: 35,000 × $0.02 = $700
- Product disposal: 5,000 × $15 = $75,000
- Disposal and documentation labor: $3,500
- Total waste cost: $79,200
Synthetic labels:
-
- Label waste rate: 0.4% = 4,000 labels
- Product scrapped due to label failure: 0.05% = 500 units
- Label waste disposal: 4,000 × $0.03 = $120
- Product disposal: 500 × $15 = $7,500
- Disposal and documentation labor: $800
- Total waste cost: $8,420
Annual waste reduction savings: $70,780
Digital Printing Changeover Advantages
For operations using digital label printing, synthetic substrates offer significant productivity advantages:
Changeover Time Comparison:
-
- Paper substrate changeover: 15-25 minutes (material sensitivity, tension adjustments)
- Synthetic substrate changeover: 8-12 minutes (consistent feed, fewer adjustments)
- Average time savings: 10 minutes per changeover
For facilities performing 200 changeovers annually:
-
- Time savings: 200 × 10 minutes = 2,000 minutes (33.3 hours)
- Labor cost savings at $45/hour: $1,498
- Additional production capacity: 33.3 hours of available runtime
Inventory Consolidation Opportunities
Synthetic labels’ superior durability and environmental resistance enable SKU consolidation strategies that reduce inventory complexity:
Traditional Paper Label Approach:
-
- Indoor warehouse labels: Standard paper
- Outdoor/harsh environment labels: Specialized coated paper
- Cold storage labels: Temperature-resistant paper
- Chemical exposure labels: Laminated paper
- Total SKU variants for 100 base products: 250-300 label SKUs
Consolidated Synthetic Approach:
-
- All-environment labels: Single synthetic material
- Total SKU variants for 100 base products: 100-120 label SKUs
Inventory management savings:
-
- Reduced purchasing complexity: 15-20 hours/year saved ($900-$1,200)
- Lower safety stock requirements: $8,000-$12,000 working capital freed
- Reduced obsolescence risk: $3,500-$5,000 annual savings
- Total consolidation benefit: $12,400-$18,200 annually
Extended Product Shelf Life
For products with long distribution cycles, label durability directly impacts saleable shelf life:
Case Example: Automotive Parts Distributor
-
- Average inventory age before sale: 18 months
- Paper labels showing degradation: 22% of 18+ month inventory
- Products re-labeled or marked down: 8,400 units annually
- Average markdown: $12/unit
- Re-labeling labor: 3,200 hours at $32/hour
Paper label costs:
-
- Markdowns: $100,800
- Re-labeling labor: $102,400
- Total: $203,200
Synthetic label outcome:
-
- Labels showing degradation: 1.2% of 18+ month inventory
- Products requiring attention: 450 units
- Markdowns: $5,400
- Re-labeling labor: $4,900
- Total: $10,300
Shelf-life extension benefit: $192,900 annually
Section 5: Industry-Specific ROI Scenarios
Chemical Products: Avoiding Re-Labeling Costs
Chemical manufacturers face unique labeling challenges from product exposure, environmental factors, and stringent GHS compliance requirements.
Industry Pain Points:
-
- Drum and container labels exposed to chemical splash, abrasion, and outdoor storage
- GHS hazard communication must remain legible throughout product life
- OSHA inspections can result in $7,000-$15,000 fines per labeling violation
- Distributor complaints about illegible labels damage relationships
Synthetic Label ROI Example:
-
- Company: Industrial chemical distributor
- Annual label volume: 450,000 labels
- Paper label failure rate in chemical environment: 6.8%
- Synthetic label failure rate: 0.5%
Cost Analysis:
-
- Avoided reapplication: 28,350 fewer failures × $8.50 per event = $240,975
- Prevented OSHA violations: Estimated 3 incidents avoided × $10,000 avg fine = $30,000
- Reduced customer complaints: 89 fewer complaints × $45 service cost = $4,005
- Additional synthetic label cost: $67,500
- Net annual savings: $207,480
- ROI: 307%
Food & Beverage: Reducing Shrink From Label Failure
The food and beverage industry operates on thin margins where label performance directly impacts profitability and food safety compliance.
Industry Challenges:
-
- Refrigeration and freezer environments cause paper label adhesive failure
- Condensation leads to illegible printing and barcode scanning issues
- FDA requires legible allergen warnings and nutrition information
- Retailer requirements for scannable barcodes at point of sale
Synthetic Label ROI Example:
-
- Company: Regional frozen food manufacturer
- Annual label volume: 2.2 million labels
- Distribution: 100% refrigerated/frozen environments
- Paper label failure rate: 4.2%
- Synthetic label failure rate: 0.3%
Cost Analysis:
-
- Product shrink avoided: 85,800 fewer failures × $4.50 avg product value = $386,100
- Retailer chargebacks avoided: 24 incidents × $2,200 avg fee = $52,800
- Reduced repack labor: 85,800 units × 3.5 minutes × $28/hr = $138,985
- Customer service time saved: 210 complaints × 25 minutes × $38/hr = $3,325
- Additional synthetic label cost: $198,000
- Net annual savings: $383,210
- ROI: 194%
Automotive: Warranty and Traceability Benefits
Automotive suppliers must maintain label legibility for the entire vehicle lifespan to support warranty claims and recall traceability.
Industry Requirements:
-
- Labels must survive 10-15 years in engine compartments (heat, oil, vibration)
- VIN and part number traceability for safety recalls
- Warranty claim validation depends on legible labels
- Supplier chargebacks for failed labels can reach $10,000-$50,000 per incident
Synthetic Label ROI Example:
-
- Company: Tier 2 automotive component supplier
- Annual label volume: 875,000 labels
- Product warranty period: 10 years
- Paper label failure rate by year 3: 18%
- Synthetic label failure rate by year 10: 2.5%
Cost Analysis:
-
- Avoided warranty claim disputes: 42 cases × $3,800 avg = $159,600
- Prevented supplier chargebacks: 6 incidents × $18,000 avg = $108,000
- Recall traceability complications avoided: 1 incident × $75,000 = $75,000
- Reduced field service label replacement: 8,500 units × $45 = $382,500
- Additional synthetic label cost: $262,500
- Net annual savings: $462,600
- ROI: 176%
Pharmaceuticals: Compliance and Recall Prevention
Pharmaceutical labeling carries the highest regulatory stakes with severe consequences for non-compliance.
Industry Critical Factors:
-
- FDA requires legible labeling throughout product shelf life (24-36 months typical)
- Lot number and expiration date must remain scannable
- Label failure can trigger FDA warning letters and product holds
- Recall costs average $500,000-$3M for pharmaceutical products
Synthetic Label ROI Example:
-
- Company: Contract pharmaceutical packager
- Annual label volume: 1.8 million labels
- Regulatory environment: FDA-audited facility
- Paper label degradation complaints: 156 annually
- Synthetic label degradation complaints: 8 annually
Cost Analysis:
-
- Avoided recall risk: 0.5 recall probability reduction × $1.2M avg cost = $600,000
- FDA audit findings eliminated: 4 findings × $22,000 avg remediation = $88,000
- Reduced customer quality complaints: 148 incidents × $185 avg cost = $27,380
- Prevented distributor returns: 2,400 units × $35 avg = $84,000
- Additional synthetic label cost: $540,000
- Net annual savings: $259,380
- ROI: 48% (conservative; does not include avoided recall probability)
Section 6: Building Your Own TCO Model
Key Metrics to Track
To build an accurate TCO comparison for your operation, you’ll need to collect data across these categories:
Acquisition Costs:
-
- Current label cost per thousand by SKU
- Quoted synthetic label cost per thousand by SKU
- Annual label volume by SKU
- Minimum order quantities (current vs. synthetic)
- Average lead times
- Freight costs per order
- Annual number of orders placed
Inventory Carrying Costs:
-
- Current label inventory value
- Warehouse space allocated to label storage (square footage)
- Cost per square foot of warehouse space
- Inventory carrying cost percentage (typically 20-25%)
- Obsolescence rate (percentage of labels disposed annually due to expiration/changes)
Operational Costs:
-
- Label application labor rate (fully loaded)
- Average application time per label
- Number of label reapplication events monthly
- Time required per reapplication
- Production downtime associated with label changes
- Quality control inspection time for labeling
Failure Costs:
-
- Customer complaints related to labels (annual count)
- Customer service time per complaint
- Retailer chargebacks (annual count and total cost)
- Product recalls or holds due to label issues (annual frequency and avg cost)
- Regulatory audit findings related to labels
- Remediation costs per audit finding
- Product scrapped due to label failure (units and value)
Data Collection Recommendations
Most organizations don’t track label-specific costs in their ERP systems. Here’s how to gather accurate data:
30-Day Tracking Period: Implement a simple tracking system for one month to establish baselines:
-
- Label Failure Log: Track every label reapplication event including:
-
- SKU affected
- Reason for failure
- Time required for remediation
- Labor cost
- Product disposition (used, scrapped, reworked)
-
- Customer Service Tickets: Flag all label-related complaints with a tracking code and record:
-
- Nature of complaint
- Resolution time
- Customer impact
- Follow-up required
-
- Inventory Snapshot: Document:
-
- Label inventory on hand by SKU
- Age of inventory
- Space occupied
- Obsolete labels disposed of
-
- Production Impact Log: Record:
-
- Changeover times by label type
- Downtime attributed to label issues
- Batch delays from labeling problems
-
- Label Failure Log: Track every label reapplication event including:
Annualize Your Findings: After 30 days, multiply monthly observations by 12 and adjust for seasonal variations if applicable.
Simple TCO Formula Framework
Use this framework to calculate your TCO comparison:
Paper Label TCO (Annual):
Acquisition Costs:
+ (Annual volume ÷ 1,000) × Cost per thousand
+ (Annual orders × Freight per order)
+ (Procurement hours × Loaded labor rate)
Carrying Costs:
+ (Average inventory value × Carrying cost %)
+ (Warehouse sq ft × Cost per sq ft)
+ (Obsolescence rate × Annual label spend)
Operational Costs:
+ (Reapplication events × Time per event × Labor rate)
+ (Production downtime hours × Opportunity cost per hour)
+ (QC inspection time × Labor rate)
Failure Costs:
+ (Customer complaints × Service cost per complaint)
+ (Retailer chargebacks: actual annual total)
+ (Recall incidents × Average recall cost)
+ (Audit findings × Remediation cost per finding)
+ (Scrapped product units × Average product value)
= TOTAL PAPER LABEL TCO
Synthetic Label TCO (Annual):
Use the same formula structure, but substitute:
– Higher cost per thousand (typically +25-40%)
– Lower reapplication event count (typically -80-95%)
– Lower obsolescence rate (extended shelf life)
– Reduced minimum order quantities (lower inventory)
– Lower failure cost incidents (dramatically reduced)
= TOTAL SYNTHETIC LABEL TCO
ROI Calculation:
Annual Savings = Paper Label TCO – Synthetic Label TCO
Additional Investment = Synthetic annual cost – Paper annual cost
ROI % = (Annual Savings ÷ Additional Investment) × 100
Payback Period (months) = (Additional Investment ÷ Annual Savings) × 12
Example Calculation: Mid-Size Manufacturer
Company Profile:
-
- 800,000 labels annually
- 45 SKUs
- Paper labels: $22/1,000
- Synthetic labels: $32/1,000
- Current failure rate: 3.8%
Paper Label TCO:
-
- Acquisition: $17,600 + $3,200 freight + $800 procurement = $21,600
- Carrying: $6,800 inventory + $2,400 storage + $1,760 obsolescence = $10,960
- Operational: $89,600 reapplication + $12,400 downtime + $8,200 QC = $110,200
- Failure: $6,800 complaints + $14,500 chargebacks + $35,000 scrap = $56,300
- Total: $199,060
Synthetic Label TCO:
-
- Acquisition: $25,600 + $2,400 freight + $600 procurement = $28,600
- Carrying: $5,100 inventory + $1,800 storage + $512 obsolescence = $7,412
- Operational: $8,960 reapplication + $2,100 downtime + $6,400 QC = $17,460
- Failure: $1,200 complaints + $2,200 chargebacks + $4,200 scrap = $7,600
- Total: $61,072
Result:
-
- Annual savings: $137,988
- Additional investment: $8,000
- ROI: 1,725%
- Payback period: 0.7 months
Downloadable TCO Calculator Tool
ProVision Labels has developed a comprehensive TCO calculator tool to simplify this analysis for your organization. Our Excel-based calculator includes:
-
- Pre-populated industry benchmark data
- Customizable input fields for your specific costs
- Automated ROI and payback calculations
- Scenario modeling for different failure rate assumptions
- Print-ready reports for stakeholder presentations
Conclusion: When Synthetic Makes Financial Sense
The financial case for synthetic labels becomes compelling when you shift from purchase price thinking to total cost of ownership analysis. Our data across hundreds of implementations reveals clear patterns:
Synthetic labels deliver superior ROI when:
-
- Label failure has high consequences: Regulated industries, consumer-facing brands, or applications where illegible labels trigger recalls, chargebacks, or compliance issues.
- Environmental conditions challenge paper: Moisture exposure, temperature extremes, chemical contact, outdoor storage, or abrasion during handling and shipping.
- Product lifecycles are extended: Long distribution cycles, slow inventory turns, or products that remain labeled for years (automotive, industrial equipment, durable goods).
- Labor costs are significant: High-wage markets, union environments, or facilities where reapplication creates production bottlenecks and delays.
- Brand reputation is paramount: Consumer brands where label appearance impacts perceived quality and premium pricing.
- Inventory complexity is high: Multiple SKUs, frequent product changes, or challenging MOQ management with traditional labels.
Paper labels may remain the better choice when:
-
- Application is truly temporary (less than 30 days in controlled environments)
- Failure consequences are minimal (internal-only labels, non-critical applications)
- Environmental conditions are ideal (climate-controlled, dry, no handling stress)
- Label changes are very frequent (weekly or more often)
- Volume is extremely low (under 50,000 labels annually)
The Decision Framework
For operations managers and procurement professionals evaluating this decision, we recommend this approach:
-
- Identify your highest-risk applications first: Where do label failures cause the most pain today? Start your TCO analysis with these SKUs.
- Run a pilot program: Convert 5-10 problem SKUs to synthetic and track results for 90 days. Use actual data to refine your TCO model.
- Calculate break-even volume: Determine at what annual volume the TCO advantage tips in favor of synthetic for each application.
- Phase implementation strategically: Begin with new product launches, then convert existing SKUs during label redesigns or when current inventory depletes.
- Monitor and optimize: Track the metrics identified in Section 6 quarterly to validate your TCO assumptions and identify additional conversion opportunities.
Take the Next Step
ProVision Labels by Ahearn & Soper brings 95+ years of labeling expertise to help you optimize label costs while improving performance. Our team specializes in helping operations leaders build data-driven business cases for label material decisions.
We offer:
-
- Free TCO Analysis: We’ll work with your team to build a customized cost comparison using your actual operational data.
- Material Samples and Testing: Test synthetic labels in your actual application environment before committing to a full rollout.
- Pilot Program Support: We’ll help you design and execute a small-scale pilot to gather real-world performance data.
- Ongoing Optimization: As your operation evolves, we’ll continue to help you identify cost-saving opportunities across your label portfolio.
Ready to see the real numbers for your operation?
Contact ProVision Labels today:
Request a TCO analysis consultation and discover how much you could be saving with the right label material strategy.
ProVision Labels by Ahearn & Soper Inc. | Your partner in cost-effective labeling solutions
FR 
EN